Axi Says 46% of Clients Now Hold Crypto Exposure
Axi says 46% of its clients now hold crypto exposure across spot ownership, CFDs, and perpetual contracts, as brokers continue adding more crypto access options.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:HKMA Warns Against Crypto Firms Posing as Banks – Protecting Public from Misleading Descriptions. Learn why false claims violate banking regulations. Stay informed!

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has expressed alarm over crypto businesses misrepresenting themselves as banks, highlighting that such acts contravene the region's Banking Ordinance. The HKMA is taking this action in order to safeguard the public from any misconceptions and hazards linked with these false descriptions.
The HKMA has issued a severe warning to cryptocurrency businesses, asking them to avoid misleading practices such as presenting themselves as banks or advertising their offerings as “deposits.” According to the HKMA, these operations violate Hong Kong's Banking Ordinance, which is meant to regulate financial institutions and protect clients.
The HKMA highlighted its knowledge of crypto firms in a statement made on September 15, using words like “crypto asset banks” and “digital banks” to characterize their activities. Furthermore, the regulator warned crypto businesses from claiming to offer banking services or banking accounts, since such acts may persuade the public to assume they are dealing with reputable financial organizations.

It should be noted that the HKMA does not supervise or regulate cryptocurrency enterprises. As a consequence, the authority lacks the resources to safeguard the security of monies handled by these businesses. The HKMA emphasized that any monies put with cryptocurrency businesses are not protected by the Hong Kong Deposit Protection Scheme, which generally protects deposits kept in conventional banks.
The HKMA advised people to consult the registry of approved institutions on its official website to check the validity of deposit-taking organizations. This record provides information on financial firms that have earned HKMA licenses to conduct banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong.
In summary, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority is taking steps to prohibit cryptocurrency enterprises from misrepresenting themselves as banks and using deceptive descriptions that may mislead the public. The main purpose is to safeguard customers by making sure they understand the nature of the financial services they are using and the amount of regulatory monitoring in place. Individuals must take vigilance and confirm the legitimacy of deposit-taking organizations, particularly when dealing with cryptocurrency-related services in Hong Kong.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Axi says 46% of its clients now hold crypto exposure across spot ownership, CFDs, and perpetual contracts, as brokers continue adding more crypto access options.

In what would lift the mood of rupee derivative traders, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) partially lifted some restrictions on rupee derivative trades imposed by the regulator on April 1, 2026. On this day, the central bank prevented banks from issuing non-deliverable forwards to clients and barred companies from reassessing forward contracts as part of its strategy to counter arbitrage trades, which caused fluctuations in the rupee’s exchange rate. The central bank further prevented banks from signing FX derivative contracts involving the rupee with their associated parties. Read on!

Have you made profitable trades on the OANDA platform but failed to withdraw anything? Have you been subject to manipulations in stop-loss and other trade orders? Did the United States-based forex broker delay both your deposits and withdrawals? In between, did the customer support service fail to resolve your queries? You are not alone! Several traders have reported these incidents on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. In this OANDA review article, we have examined these allegations for you to glance at. Read on!

XPO, a Belize-based multi-asset broker, has been in the news lately for the wrong reasons. These include the infamous allegations from 450K people towards the end of 2025 in India. The collective siphoned amount goes up to $420 million. According to news reports, the trading platform is still active, making it extremely important for traders to adopt extreme caution. The reviews shared by the users on WikiFX are not encouraging either. We have covered the perils associated with this brokerage entity holistically in this XPO review article. We will approach by outlining the company details before sharing the user allegations. Let’s begin!